Charter Schools Seen as Catalyst for Change
East Atlanta Patch editor takes looks at charter benefits
East Atlanta Patch editor Péralte Paul recently wrote the following opinion article asking if charter schools provide strong competition for traditional public schools, spurring them to improve.
Paul cites the proposed constitutional amendment on charter schools sponsored by Buckhead representive Edward Lindsey, the House majority Whip, and his article makes strong points for Buckhead readers interested in the charter school debate.
By Péralte Paul
I had an interesting discussion the other night with some East Atlanta parents.
We started talking about redistricting in the Atlanta Public Schools, then the topic turned to the ways that charter schools impact traditional public schools.
In East Atlanta Patch, we’re fortunate to have a number of good traditional public schools with fiercely dedicated and involved parents: Burgess-Peterson Academy in East Atlanta, Mary Lin Elementary in Candler Park and Parkside Elementary in Grant Park.
But we also have schools that aren’t doing so well.
Due to poor academic performance, some of the schools suffer from under-enrollment and risk being closed as a result of the redistricting process.
Uncertainty surrounding APS schools, as well as questions about the district's final redistricting recommendations, have raised concens within East Atlanta and other neighborhoods. Will all this tumult lead to more charter schools?
Charter schools are public schools but they are not subject to all the rules and regulations of the district. While the district has oversight and charters have performance targets they must meet, these schools have their own boards that govern their operations.
Our Patch has a fair number of charters already:
- Ivy Preparatory Academy for Girls and Ivy Prep for Boys in Parkview
- Tech High in Reynoldstown
- Atlanta Neighborhood Charter School in Ormewood Park and Grant Park
- Wesley International Academy in Custer/McDonough/Guice
- Drew Charter School in East Lake
The redistricting has sparked quite a few “what-if” discussions among parents in all Patch neighborhoods. One idea even involves converting Grant Park’s King Middle School into a charter school.
At the state capitol, Republicans are pushing legislation to grant the Georgia Charter Schools Commission the authority to create charter schools. Currently, that power rests with locally elected school districts, and the Georgia Supreme Court has upheld that move.
Democrats oppose the measure, noting that it lacks set funding levels. Also, in a state where 90 percent of students attend public schools, this move represents a slow creep toward universal educational vouchers.
“We are very much under threat of universal vouchers in this state,” state Sen. Nan Orrock, a Democrat, said Wednesday night at a meeting of the Inman Park Neighborhood Association.
Voucher supporters are “really, really anti-public schools," she said. "This is the same crowd that’s cut over a $1 billion out of K-12” in the last eight years.
I don’t have kids. Until the redistricting issue, I hadn’t considered Georgia education from a parent's perspective.
But I do wonder, what’s wrong with offering parents more choices with respect to their kids’ education?
Most of my career as a journalist has been covering business and one truism in that world is that competition forces all players to innovate and improve to keep customers.
Just look at some of the world’s most admired companies like Apple, Toyota and Google.
Companies that don't innovate and improve risk failure. Just look at Kodak — which is seeking bankruptcy protection — Office Max and Hewlett-Packard.
In schooling, we've had parochial and non-religious private schools as an alternative for decades. But parents who send their kids to private institutions still have to pay for their local schools through property taxes. In effect, they're paying twice.
At least with charter schools, which are funded through the same local property tax dollars, APS gets a referendum of sorts from parents who want a public school education but feel the district or their local school isn't operating at a level they trust or find acceptable.
I know children aren't commodities — although K-12 education is a multi-billion dollar business in America.
Are there lessons to be applied from business in education?
I'm curious to hear your take.
Joan J. Strong
6:51 pm on Monday, February 20, 2012
Charter schools trade one lobby--the teacher's unions--with another lobby--the Charter school industry. They solve nothing. Do you really think the "new boss" (same as the old boss) is going to lobby congress to cut spending when their profits depending on that spending? Mixing government money and for-profit companies is ALWAYS a bad idea.
Republicans should not be fooled by this. Look beyond this election cycle and understand there's more to life than cutting off a key donor to the Democrats (Charters will start giving them money soon enough).
Also, do you happen to "like" your local public school? Is it working well? Great test scores? If so, understand your school is FIRST IN LINE for a take-over by a for-profit Charter school. Only dummies go after low-performing school districts and failing schools. If you want to make real money, you grab the rich districts FIRST where getting high test scores is like shooting fish in a barrel.
Please take a look at what happened in Orange County, CA (Google: barcelona charter school) or what is in the process of happening in Los Altos, CA (Google: bullis charter). These are top-ranked Districts where crony capitalism is wiping out years of diligent parent participation to make their local schools great.