No District Changes for E. Rivers, Brandon in New APS Report
Demographers in recommendation to Davis posted Friday say Brandon expansion, rebuilding E. Rivers to capacity of 792, will handle growth
Planned expansion of Morris Brandon and the rebuilding of E. Rivers will provide sufficient capacity over the next five years, and "no elementary boundaries should be changed,"APS demographers say in new recommendations for Superintendent Erroll B. Davis Jr. posted Friday.
"The new E. Rivers (at a capacity of 792) should be able to absorb the preschool enrollment “bubble” and Bolton will stay below 100% capacity if the proportion of preschool students entering the school occurs at the rate forecasted," the consultants say in their report, which Davis will consider in forming his preliminary recommendations, to be posted on the APS web site Sunday and presented to the Atlanta Board of Education Monday.
Previous recommendations had caused for changes in the Brandon and E. Rivers districts, drawing strong opposition from neigborhood groups.
The demographers also said that "Garden Hills is the facility that has the highest probability of exceeding the 100% capacity threshold over the next five years and we recommend that APS continue to study alternatives for accommodating projected enrollment growth at this facility." They did not mention proposals for a new primary center for the school, as have been offered.
While the demographers say that additional elementary capacity will be needed for Garden Hills if the school is not expanded or a portion of its area redistricted, "we are not recommending a location or attendance zone for a new elementary school at this time."
In middle school options, the demographers say enough combined capacity will exist at Sutton and North Atlanta middle schools for at least the next six to eight years. The report doen't make a final decision on a middle school configuration, saying either a sixth grade academy at Sutton and a seventh and eight grade at the present North Atlanta High buildng would work, as would separate sixth through eighth grade facilities.
Apparently in reaction to oppostion to a plan to move Centennial Place students to Buckhead middle and high schools, the demographers say that their middle school recommendation "assumes that additional capacity will be created within SRT 3 to accommodate grade 6-8 enrollment growth in that area."
The demographers said they did not compile new maps for the revised recommendations to Davis, but would use the existing maps for previously released Options A and B, upon which residents made their comments. To view the maps, go to the APS website.
Here are the consultants' introduction and summary for School Reform Team 4 North, the North Atlanta cluster. For the demographers' complete report, including all areas of the city, see the attached PDF.
The following pages outline the Consultant Team’s preliminary recommendations to Superintendent Davis regarding the development of a single “preferred” redistricting scenario. These recommendations were developed after (1) reviewing the demographic trends/forecasts of the district’s attendance areas; (2) considering public input given during the January 30 to February 2 community meetings; (3) reading written comments received since the community meetings; and (4) making a final recalculation of all facility capacities. At this point we have not addressed the appropriate phasing of these recommendations or their fiscal implications to the District. We have also chosen not to prepare a map of illustrating the recommendations outlined below and instead direct reviewers to appropriate sections of the Options A and B maps currently posted on the APS web site. The Consultant Team will instead focus our time on preparing maps to support the Superintendent’s preferred plan to be released on March 5. Our recommendations are as follows:
SRT 4 North
With the planned expansion of Brandon and the rebuilding of Rivers, the District should have sufficient capacity in this area to accommodate expected enrollment increases over the next 5 years. No elementary boundaries should be changed. The new E. Rivers (at a capacity of 792) should be able to absorb the preschool enrollment “bubble” and Bolton will stay below 100% capacity if the proportion of preschool students entering the school occurs at the rate forecasted. Garden Hills is the facility that has the highest probability of exceeding the 100% capacity threshold over the next five years and we recommend that APS continue to study alternatives for accommodating projected enrollment growth at this facility. Absent of expanding or redistricting a portion of Garden Hills, additional elementary school capacity will probably still be needed in the out years of the forecast. However, we are not recommending a location or attendance zone for a new elementary school at this time.
As for the middle schools, there is sufficient combined capacity at Sutton MS and the new North Atlanta MS to serve SRT 4 for at least the next 6 to 8 years. A configuration of either a 6th grade center at Sutton and 7-8 grade center at the current North Atlanta HS, or two grade 6-8 middle schools at each location will work. This recommendation assumes that additional capacity will be created within SRT 3 to accommodate grade 6-8 enrollment growth in that area.
Anne
11:42 am on Friday, March 2, 2012
I am for the TWO MIDDLE SCHOOLS option 100%! Sutton has to start at 9am presently, one hour later than normal, just to bus everyone from all six feeder schools every morning. Having two middle schools would eliminate this long bus ride for our children, be better for the economy and environment, and allow us all to have true neighborhood schools serving our own communities. Also, the logistics of having two campuses four miles apart with the same principal, staff, etc. would not work well logistically at all! Also, parents with children at both campuses would suffer, and can you imagine bussing to both campuses?Maybe school would have to start at 10am! And, children would have to change schools way to often. I see no benefits whatsoever of a 6th grade annex.
Hippy Chick
12:02 pm on Saturday, March 3, 2012
Unbelievable. The experts agree Garden Hills will be the the only overcrowed school in the north cluster but they offer no solution!?! Wasn't that the purpose of this exercise? Or are the demographers onto the fact that most of the homeowners in the zone don't attend public school, ergo: no solution is necessary.
Poor Garden Hills - this was the second chance in 5 or so years for possible relief from high density housing. Their school zone needs either a.) more single family homes/fewer apartment complexes, b.) fewer CTK devotees, c.) fewer private school "climbers" or d.) more faith and support in their neighborhood school. It's really all of the above. APS could've helped out in one area, but the majority of the blame lies with your next door neighbors. Realistically, unless more Lindberg Marta apartments are built (and filled with students) AND/OR the single-family homes decide to attend their public school, GH probably won't be overcrowded. Sadly, the cards are stacked against the hard-working skeleton crew of GH parent volunteers. It's status quo. Garden Hills.... the North Cluster's step-child.
Anne
11:43 am on Sunday, March 11, 2012
Be with us in middle school! Garden Hills, Jackson,
Anne
11:47 am on Sunday, March 11, 2012
Be with us in middle school! Garden Hills, Jackson, Sarah Smith.
You won't be the "step-child," but, instead, a respected part of a community school. March 13 is your final chance to voice your opinion.
TWO MIDDLE SCHOOLS!!!
Karen
2:16 pm on Sunday, March 4, 2012
Anne, research has shown over and over that sixth graders should either be kept at the elementary level or by themselves. Here is just one such study: http://sanford.duke.edu/research/papers/SAN07-01.pdf There are numerous others. Sixth graders are easy targets for older children to bully. It is an extremely vulnerable time in a child's life. It is not about commute times or other inconveniences. It is about what is best for the children. They used to have junior high (just 7th and 8th) and retained 6th graders at the elementary level. Research has shown that is a much better model.
Anne
11:24 am on Sunday, March 11, 2012
"commute times or other inconveniences" ??? I AM talking what's best for the students when I mention these!!!
APS Parent
3:19 am on Friday, March 23, 2012
Sutton MS does a nice job of separating 6,7, & 8 grades with different floors/wings and different schedules. There is limited interaction- which could cut-down on older v. Younger student problems. This could be replicated in another middle school in the cluster- either East/West or North/South. Our school informed us of a petition for two schools- http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/meet-in-the-middle-aps.html
Anne
11:21 am on Sunday, March 11, 2012
Karen, can you post any OTHER studies? I have not seen any. There are also studies done saying that too many school transitions are detrimental to students and grades drop.
Here is one excerpt:
"I have not seen persuasive data that any of these new configurations is a better model than what we now have. In fact, more convincing is the research that students lose ground in transition years, suggesting that we ought to minimize how many times kids move from one new school setting to another.
Research (Alspaugh 1999) has shown that students suffer achievement loss during each transition year."
And, there are numerous other reasons for TWO MIDDLE SCHOOLS, including not having six feeder schools from all over the North Atlanta cluster going into one middle school when you could have two middle schools serving the area where the students actually live meaning more parent involvement, which is extremely important to the success of all schools. There would be double the opportunity for students to participate in band, chorus, sports, and become leaders in their school in a maximized learning environment. And, as I mentioned before, it would be a logistical nightmare. There are so many more pros for two middle schools. What are the pros for a sixth grade academy besides the one you mentioned that could be argued either way?