Evidently the powers that be do not have enough of your money. The newest boondoggle is the transportation "reinvestment" act. Translation, let's take $8.5 billion of your money and make it not belong to you anymore. Yes, your money. I was unfortunate enough to be "educated" by the whiteshirts at a meeting over a week ago at my local Optimist Club. Evidently, due to people being conscientous about saving on fuel, via the gas tax, they have less money to burn.
Evidently, traffic is a problem that cannot be solved by the existing methods or money they currently have. They need more. The current campaign is widespread and organized. They have a rough budget of $8 million to advertise and spread the word of what you really need. $8 million for $8.5 billion sounds like a good return on your investment, doesn't it? There are meetings in every district surrounding metro-Atlanta. Unfortunately, the message is always the same as in most campaigns, we can spend your hard earned money better than you.
My solution is a simple one. We can figure out our own way out of our own problems. People will create there own solutions. If your commute is 2 hours, maybe moving closer to your job is a solution. If you like where you live, you will hike it and make it ok and endure a small setback for your decisions. Maybe that time in the car is the only time you have to yourself all week. If you do not like the price of gas, maybe you get off your butt, get in shape, and ride a bike that you have not ridden since you were 15......crazy thoughts....people making their own decisions I know.
July 31st is a big day here in metro Atlanta. It is the day where the least amount of voters make the decisions for the most amount of people about taking their money away from them. The decision for this vote was calculated as having the best chance to pass due to the least amount of voting public actually voting. Use your head, keep your money in your pocket and solve your own problems. Vote no.
Neal Dow
10:50 am on Monday, April 23, 2012
I have lived here since the mid 60s. There has been continous (as opposed to continual) road construction. I think the taxpayers should keep their money. The metro area has been a cash cow for developers and contractors.
Smyna Res
7:08 pm on Tuesday, April 24, 2012
I think your post indicates that these initiatives would just be funding commuter transportation improvements, which is not the case. A strong transportation infrastructure in this state will allow us to continue to attract the likes of Caterpillar and Kia. There is a significant economic affect from this bill that should not be ignored.
Erik Fernald
7:55 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Good post Smyna Res. I am not against some expenditures on our state's highway and transit systems. However the massive and totality of the increase is just outrageous with no end in sight. They put in a "sunset" clause that has no chance of happening. There is a $689 million provision for Towne Center for example. If the need for this expenditure is legitimate the residents of that town (Kennesaw I
believe) should vote for a bond hearing and make the improvements themselves. Local municipalities with local control over expenditures should be the ones making the decision what to do and how to do it . Cost overruns never stop and without local oversight (via their own local money at stake) it will turn into a giant mess. I used to live in Boston and the "Big Dig" was a prime example of how to burn money. I see it time and time again, and the tax payers are always the one holding the bag.
dwigdwig
11:06 am on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
I just read the referendum facts doc. How does this "bail out MARTA"? It provides $600M to repair elevators and escalators, improved lighting, upgrades to the train control system and other maintenance needs.
Guess who also receives operation and maintenance support? GRTA and Gwinett County Transit. Are they getting a "bailout" as well?
C.J.
2:29 pm on Thursday, April 26, 2012
RE: "There is a significant economic affect from this bill that should not be ignored."
Agreed. Our congested highways and lack of alternative forms of transportation are costing us money.
According to the latest S&P Case-Shiller numbers, housing prices in the 20 largest metro areas fell by 3.5 percent from February 2011 to February 2012 (see link below). By comparison, the price decline for metro Atlanta during the same period was 17.3 percent--by far, the largest drop in the country.
Consider what the market value of your home was this time last year and multiply that by 17.3 percent. In my case, it's somewhere in the neighborhood of $35,000, give or take. That's a pretty good indication of how much money metro area homeowners have lost because of our refusal to pay the taxes needed to avoid running out of water during a significant drought, having among the dirtiest air in the country, having among the worst schools in the country, having among the highest unemployment rates in the country, and having among the most congested roads in the country.
The Atlanta-area used to be considered forward-thinking and business friendly. Not anymore. Things are never going to improve for us until we stop being penny-wise and pound foolish.
http://tinyurl.com/c44qmf7
Erik Fernald
7:53 pm on Thursday, April 26, 2012
Nice comments Chris, as I said to Smyna Res above, local governments can control this and keep costs in line via local municipal bonds. People's faith in government spending grows weaker and weaker the further it goes away from where they live. The levels of abuse and corruption rise in dramatic fashion the further your money goes away from your wallet. I trust the people I know in my town to make the right decisions because I know them. A guy with a vested interest in the town he resides is less likely to steal money from people he wants to do business with in the future when his reputation on the line. In contrast, there are countless stories of how our money is virtually stolen and wasted when state and federal contracts are on the line. Think about the Atlanta airport for example. I am glad you wrote what you did, but I do not think the decline in home values is linked to transportation. Most of it comes from a government infusion of free money to people who were unqualified to buy homes, putting upward pressure on the market, driving up prices. What comes up, must come down.
C.J.
9:40 pm on Thursday, April 26, 2012
Erik, I'm not entirely sure what you mean by "government infusion of free money", but if I understand you correctly, then it's worth remembering that, until they were placed into conservatorship in September of 2008, Fannie and Freddie were private organizations, traded on the New York Stock Exchange. They've since been de-listed, but if you want to take a chance, you can still by shares of Freddie Mac over-the-counter for about 29 cents per share, give or take.
The money they blew on bad loans and mortgage-backed securities was not government money, but money raised by selling stock and issuing bonds, just like any other publicly-traded company. In addition, their holdings made up a minority of the securities and loans that went bad when the financial crisis hit. Their mismanagement and misbehavior contributed to the financial crisis, but they had a lot of help from the largest commercial banks along with the six largest investment banks that were the dominant players driving sub-prime lending--much of which went to middle and upper income households.
With regard to Atlanta home prices, none of this explains why we're doing significantly worse in that and so many other areas than other states and cities throughout the country.
I appreciate your post and the conversation.
R. Anderson
12:16 pm on Friday, April 27, 2012
The Atlanta area was one of the fastest growing on the east coast. Sub prime mortgages were rampant in this area. That led to predatory lending. And that led to the Georgia Fair Lending Act (Barnes). The next legislative session gutted it.
I think this is why we're doing significantly worse. We had the biggest bubble therefore the biggest bust.
Neal Dow
8:50 am on Tuesday, May 1, 2012
From today's Marietta Daily Journal - Larry Savage of east Cobb, who is running for county commission chairman in the July 31 election, said the takeaway from the meeting is that traffic relief is not the primary goal of the TIA.
“A lot of our legislators said they saw it as a way to address traffic congestion in metro Atlanta, and the conversation here this evening makes it clear that that is at best a secondary component of this thing,” Savage said after the meeting. “All the discussion that you can’t do 75, you wouldn’t get enough redevelopment out of it, what does that tell you? Tells you traffic congestion is not your goal.”
The real goal is development, redevelopment and real estate, Savage said.