.
News Alert
Atlanta Police Investigating Death at Buckhead…

MARTA Should Not Be Privatized

Why we should oppose the privatization of MARTA

By

The Atlanta Public Sector Alliance

For many years now, there has been discussion at the state legislature about privatizing MARTA. In recent weeks, it has intensified. In fact, the chair of the MARTA legislative oversight committee MARTOC, Mike Jacobs, has said that “privatizing some MARTA functions is essential.” Privatization is being presented as a necessary move because of MARTA’s ongoing financial crisis. MARTA predicts a $33.29 million deficit in this year. Just as we saw with Grady Memorial Hospital or the proliferation of charter schools, seizing public services by private interests is the preferred choice of many politicians when dealing with financial problems of institutions.

What does privatization mean? Essentially, it is the transfer of public assets and services owned and performed by government agencies to businesses and individuals from the private sector. Privatization results in the replacement of public participation and institutional responsibility with a profit motive. Private sector decision making is private– the community has no rights to discuss and make policy. Instead of people governing, markets govern. Instead of service-providing, making money becomes the driving force. The people who suffer the most from this policy are those who have been traditionally marginalized from the seats of power – the poor, the working class, people of color (especially women), and those with disabilities.

Who is responsible for the fact MARTA is continually in crisis? The answer is found in MARTA history. MARTA was a public system set up to fail because of its funding structure. MARTA’s operating budget depends on what it collects at the fare box and the one-cent sales tax that Fulton, DeKalb, and the city of Atlanta agreed to levy in 1971 in order to create the system. For racist reasons, Gwinnett and Clayton rejected the sales tax and refused to join. This meant a “metropolitan” system was reduced to serving just two counties. The other huge factor in this set-up has been the fact that MARTA is the largest transit system in the country to receive no operating help from the state.

Privatization has a proven track record of failure. For example, the privatization of the Atlanta water and sewer system in 1999 led to the city cancelling its contract with United Water after four years of terrible service. MARTA brought back in-house its paratransit service in 1997 because of all the problems with the private contractor, Dave Transportation. In 2004, the British multi-national, First Transit, began operating the CTRAN buses in Clayton County. Three years later, MARTA took over the service. The bottom line is that the profit motive has no place in public transit. There are some necessary services that a society provides that are not designed to make a profit – fire, police, libraries, schools, and mass transit.

Other funding mechanisms, including state-funding must be found to restore MARTA to its rightful place at the core of any regional system that will be developed in the future. In order to correct the racist history that has had such influence on the lack of development and maintenance of MARTA, it will take a social movement led by those most affected – transit dependent riders and transit workers – to demand that MARTA remain in the hands of the people not the profiteers.

The Atlanta Public Sector Alliance urges all residents of Metro Atlanta to stop this take-over of public assets for the enrichment of a private few. Let’s organize for a regional transit system that is just and equitable, democratic and well-funded, with universal design to facilitate the mobility of all. Only a public MARTA can achieve these goals.

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Bryan Farley September 20, 2012 at 03:30 PM
There are privatized systems. One major one is NICE in Long Island, New York, formally Long Island Bus of MTA. Not a good idea though. The first thing the new NICE bus did once it was officially in service was cut bus service. NYC use to have many privatized agencies in Queens and now they are all call MTA Bus. What the state needs to do is get off its tail, remove the 50/50 rule and put some real funding into MARTA. They also need to have the surrounding counties fund MARTA and stop letting them get off the hook with these crappy systems that do a poor job of what MARTA would be doing.
SarionFetecuse September 20, 2012 at 07:42 PM
So we can't none-coercively pay for a system of transit that is in high demand by consumers? You are aware of the laws of supply and demand, right? You don't need a state to point guns at people, to coerce them into doing what they already want to do. Besides, government also has little incentive to save money, since they basically have no competition. And it's not like tax payer's can stop paying for it. If you spend other people's money, and those people have no face to you. And you've been indoctrinated into statism all your life, that government is good; the broken window fallacy works too! Who's to say your money is not well spent in our secular God! The state!
Jack of Kings September 25, 2012 at 12:34 AM
Great opinion piece with all the elements of an opinion piece-- very biased and presumptive. Thanks for sharing, though. Check the experience of Indiana in the privatizing of its toll roads. So far, so good.
Mike Phillips September 26, 2012 at 12:09 PM
Completely agree. The media down here really pushes privatization as a 'cure-all' or a panacea, when it does no such thing. Why don't you ask all those North Fulton cities how privatization is working out. They are basically getting no bang for their buck other than more cops. Roswell Road in Sandy Springs is still a parking lot and many roads up there are in awful shape. What I love is how hypocritical these North Fulton cities are. They say they wanted to break away from Fulton so they could have more local control over everything. Then what they do go ahead and do? Privatize all their main city functions, so that they have no local control. These companies charge them an arm and a leg to perform basic city functions, and give them virtually nothing on their investment. Companies are only there for profit. They have no stake in the city's future and could care less what happens to it. I am sick and tired of all the government bashing down here. The private sector needs to be held more accountable for everything they do. They are not exactly saints.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »